We help users of online platforms assert their rights

We help users of online platforms assert their rights in situations where they disagree with a platform's decision – whether it concerns content removal, account suspension, restrictions on the reach of posts, or other measures that significantly affect their digital rights.

The Digital Ombudsman is a certified out-of-court dispute settlement body under Article 21 of the Digital Services Act (DSA), backed by the Czech think-tank Institute H21.

What can we help with?

Blocked account

We can help you if your account was unjustifiably blocked, either permanently or temporarily

Removed content

We can help you if your content was unjustifiably removed

Restricted account

We can help you if the functions of your account or the reach of your posts were unjustifiably restricted.

Other measures

We're also addressing other practices by which these platforms infringe on your digital rights

Our assistance

Our assistance works as follows: every dispute is assigned to an independent and professionally qualified ombudsman, who reviews the case and issues a decision. The ombudsman is selected based on the subject matter of the dispute, the language of the proceedings, and their area of expertise, while ensuring that any conflict of interest is excluded. More complex cases are decided by a three-member panel to ensure a plurality of expert perspectives and greater credibility of the decision.

How Does Decision-Making Work?

In accordance with Article 21 of the DSA, our decisions are not legally binding on the parties to the dispute – they have the character of an expert and impartial assessment of the matter. Nevertheless, they carry real weight: under the DSA, online platform providers are required to engage with out-of-court dispute settlement in good faith, and our decisions serve as an important basis for further action, including potential court proceedings. Experience from other ombudsman-type institutions also shows that reasoned decisions are respected in practice in the vast majority of cases.

We are built on independence, accessibility, and a commitment to fairness. The decision-making activity of our ombudsmen is strictly independent and impartial; ombudsmen decide solely according to their best knowledge and conscience, free from any external influence. They are also independent of the Digital Ombudsman itself. Respect for the principle of viewpoint neutrality is a matter of course – we ensure a fair and balanced assessment of every case.